Re: Mic Doesn't Work on Vista
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:26 pm
if they were to go thru that trouble he may as well just find out his sound card specsLauren wrote:Find out the make and model of mic and ill get it to work for him
if they were to go thru that trouble he may as well just find out his sound card specsLauren wrote:Find out the make and model of mic and ill get it to work for him
You know, it's fairly rare I find more than 1-2 things to post about here. It's even rarer that I'm not sure what to think of someone for an extended period. I guess exceptions prove the rules, eh?Lauren wrote:FUCK I YA KNOW WHAT VISTA JUST SUCKS FORGET ABOUT IT >: it'll just need a update thats all what will be wrong nothing more and the update will be like 6 words of coding too tbh which is a waste of time and idk why microsoft made up such shitty patches in the first place.
how about a little litmus test? A/S/L/Programming languages of choice? Though, if the last one produces nonzero to (strstr(strupr(s),"BASIC")), then no need to bother with the first three, because they won't matter... ;-P
Lol, indeedBTW, 96-bit patch? Sounds about the size of what it took to mute some of the more annoying spam from JA+ serverside.
You seem to have not answered the key one, though. Or are you saying it would in fact be nonzero? :SLauren wrote:how about a little litmus test? A/S/L/Programming languages of choice? Though, if the last one produces nonzero to (strstr(strupr(s),"BASIC")), then no need to bother with the first three, because they won't matter... ;-P
Ofc they won't 0_o
Can you state why 96 specifically?Lauren wrote:Lol, indeedBTW, 96-bit patch? Sounds about the size of what it took to mute some of the more annoying spam from JA+ serverside.
Well, it does seem to be confirming my suspicions more than not. :S I wonder if you know why it's 96... it's sort of old-people humor, in a twisted sort of way... you'll know what I mean if you do get it. ;)Max Rambone wrote:This thread makes me sad.
You calling me a fake?A nub is In Ur Forum wrote:Well, it does seem to be confirming my suspicions more than not. :S I wonder if you know why it's 96... it's sort of old-people humor, in a twisted sort of way... you'll know what I mean if you do get it.Max Rambone wrote:This thread makes me sad.